Review



262 antibody  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems 262 antibody
    262 Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 17 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alcam+cd166+pe/10__1158_slash_1535___7163__mct___25___0136-138-33-37?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 17 article reviews
    262 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    Miltenyi Biotec anti cd166 pe alcam
    Anti Cd166 Pe Alcam, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alcam+cd166+pe/pmc12554783-355-23-30?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cd166 pe alcam - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems 262 antibody
    262 Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alcam+cd166+pe/10__1158_slash_1535___7163__mct___25___0136-138-33-37?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    262 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems alcam cd166 pe
    Alcam Cd166 Pe, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alcam+cd166+pe/10__1158_slash_1535___7163__mct___25___0136-138-31-37?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    alcam cd166 pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems alcam cd166 pe conjugated antibody
    Alcam Cd166 Pe Conjugated Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alcam+cd166+pe/pmc12729689-97-29-34?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    alcam cd166 pe conjugated antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems human alcam cd166 phycoerythrin pe conjugated antibody
    Human Alcam Cd166 Phycoerythrin Pe Conjugated Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alcam+cd166+pe/pm40974574-784-15-22?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human alcam cd166 phycoerythrin pe conjugated antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems anti human cd166 pe
    (A-B) Schematic representation of the treatment regimen used to evaluate the in vivo anti-tumor activity of irinotecan (CPT-11). Irinotecan was administered to tumor-bearing mice based on a dosing schedule (50 mg/kg, once weekly x 4 weeks) designed to approximate the pharmacokinetics of the drug’s active metabolite (SN-38) in human colon cancer patients. Irinotecan’s activity was compared to that of a negative control, consisting of the drug’s vehicle alone (saline solution). Downward arrows: drug injections. Upward arrows: tumor analysis. Images created using BioRender.com. (C) Scatter-plot showing the expression profile of CD44 and ALCAM <t>(CD166)</t> in a PDX-COLON-8 tumor, as evaluated by flow cytometry. The scatter-plot is gated on live human epithelial cells (DAPI neg , Mouse-lineage neg , EpCAM + ) and displays the co-existence of two major sub-populations: 1) a population expressing high levels of CD44 and ALCAM (CD44 + /CD166 + ) and known to be enriched in cells with a “cancer stem cell” (CSC) phenotype (red gate); and 2) a population expressing low levels of CD44 and ALCAM (CD44 neg /CD166 neg ) and known to consist in non-tumorigenic (NT) cells (blue gate). (D) Volcano plot reporting the results of the transcription factor target gene (TFTG) analysis, in which each transcription factor (TF) is plotted based on the magnitude of its differential activation in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells following in vivo exposure to irinotecan (x-axis) and the statistical significance of such differential activation (y-axis). Dotted line: p=0.00001 (cutoff for statistical significance after Bonferroni correction). The volcano plot identifies two transcriptional repressors (E2F4, TFDP1) among the most differentially activated TFs (red dots). (E) Scatter-plots showing the fold-change in expression level following in vivo exposure to irinotecan of all measurable genes, as measured in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg cells (x-axis) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells (y-axis), and after stratification of genes in targets (red circles) and non-targets (blue triangles) of E2F4 and TFDP1. Following in vivo exposure to irinotecan, genes suppressed by E2F4 and TFDP1 display a higher induction in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg (NT) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + (CSC) cells, as revealed by their visual enrichment below the line of equivalence (x=y; dotted line). (F) Average fold-change in expression level following in vivo exposure to irinotecan, and average difference in such fold-change (Δ), for genes classified as targets and non-targets of E2F4 and TFDP1, in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg cells (NT) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells (CSC). The difference in the up-regulation of E2F4 and TFDP1 target genes is statistically significant (Welch’s t-test, 2-sided). Error bars: mean +/-95% confidence interval (CI). (G) Schematic representation of the DREAM repressor complex, listing its major structural components. The complex can include, alternatively, the RBL2 (p130) or RBL1 (p107) proteins. (H) Scatter-plot displaying the distribution of E2F4 and TFDP1 mRNA expression levels in normal colorectal tissues (n=51) and primary CRCs (n=622) included in the Colon Adenocarcinoma (COAD) and Rectal Adenocarcinoma (READ) datasets of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) repository. E2F4 and TFDP1 expression levels are positively correlated to each other (r=0.56; p <0.001). (I-J) Violin-plots comparing the distribution of E2F4 and TFDP1 expression levels between normal colorectal tissues (n=51) and primary CRCs (n=622) from TCGA’s COAD and READ datasets. Both E2F4 and TFDP1 are overexpressed in tumor as compared to normal tissues (Mann-Whitney U-test, two-sided).
    Anti Human Cd166 Pe, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alcam+cd166+pe/bio_rxiv__2025__01__22__633435-119-42-45?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human cd166 pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems clone 105902
    (A-B) Schematic representation of the treatment regimen used to evaluate the in vivo anti-tumor activity of irinotecan (CPT-11). Irinotecan was administered to tumor-bearing mice based on a dosing schedule (50 mg/kg, once weekly x 4 weeks) designed to approximate the pharmacokinetics of the drug’s active metabolite (SN-38) in human colon cancer patients. Irinotecan’s activity was compared to that of a negative control, consisting of the drug’s vehicle alone (saline solution). Downward arrows: drug injections. Upward arrows: tumor analysis. Images created using BioRender.com. (C) Scatter-plot showing the expression profile of CD44 and ALCAM <t>(CD166)</t> in a PDX-COLON-8 tumor, as evaluated by flow cytometry. The scatter-plot is gated on live human epithelial cells (DAPI neg , Mouse-lineage neg , EpCAM + ) and displays the co-existence of two major sub-populations: 1) a population expressing high levels of CD44 and ALCAM (CD44 + /CD166 + ) and known to be enriched in cells with a “cancer stem cell” (CSC) phenotype (red gate); and 2) a population expressing low levels of CD44 and ALCAM (CD44 neg /CD166 neg ) and known to consist in non-tumorigenic (NT) cells (blue gate). (D) Volcano plot reporting the results of the transcription factor target gene (TFTG) analysis, in which each transcription factor (TF) is plotted based on the magnitude of its differential activation in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells following in vivo exposure to irinotecan (x-axis) and the statistical significance of such differential activation (y-axis). Dotted line: p=0.00001 (cutoff for statistical significance after Bonferroni correction). The volcano plot identifies two transcriptional repressors (E2F4, TFDP1) among the most differentially activated TFs (red dots). (E) Scatter-plots showing the fold-change in expression level following in vivo exposure to irinotecan of all measurable genes, as measured in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg cells (x-axis) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells (y-axis), and after stratification of genes in targets (red circles) and non-targets (blue triangles) of E2F4 and TFDP1. Following in vivo exposure to irinotecan, genes suppressed by E2F4 and TFDP1 display a higher induction in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg (NT) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + (CSC) cells, as revealed by their visual enrichment below the line of equivalence (x=y; dotted line). (F) Average fold-change in expression level following in vivo exposure to irinotecan, and average difference in such fold-change (Δ), for genes classified as targets and non-targets of E2F4 and TFDP1, in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg cells (NT) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells (CSC). The difference in the up-regulation of E2F4 and TFDP1 target genes is statistically significant (Welch’s t-test, 2-sided). Error bars: mean +/-95% confidence interval (CI). (G) Schematic representation of the DREAM repressor complex, listing its major structural components. The complex can include, alternatively, the RBL2 (p130) or RBL1 (p107) proteins. (H) Scatter-plot displaying the distribution of E2F4 and TFDP1 mRNA expression levels in normal colorectal tissues (n=51) and primary CRCs (n=622) included in the Colon Adenocarcinoma (COAD) and Rectal Adenocarcinoma (READ) datasets of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) repository. E2F4 and TFDP1 expression levels are positively correlated to each other (r=0.56; p <0.001). (I-J) Violin-plots comparing the distribution of E2F4 and TFDP1 expression levels between normal colorectal tissues (n=51) and primary CRCs (n=622) from TCGA’s COAD and READ datasets. Both E2F4 and TFDP1 are overexpressed in tumor as compared to normal tissues (Mann-Whitney U-test, two-sided).
    Clone 105902, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alcam+cd166+pe/pm39740663-702-171-173?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    clone 105902 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems fab6561p
    (A-B) Schematic representation of the treatment regimen used to evaluate the in vivo anti-tumor activity of irinotecan (CPT-11). Irinotecan was administered to tumor-bearing mice based on a dosing schedule (50 mg/kg, once weekly x 4 weeks) designed to approximate the pharmacokinetics of the drug’s active metabolite (SN-38) in human colon cancer patients. Irinotecan’s activity was compared to that of a negative control, consisting of the drug’s vehicle alone (saline solution). Downward arrows: drug injections. Upward arrows: tumor analysis. Images created using BioRender.com. (C) Scatter-plot showing the expression profile of CD44 and ALCAM <t>(CD166)</t> in a PDX-COLON-8 tumor, as evaluated by flow cytometry. The scatter-plot is gated on live human epithelial cells (DAPI neg , Mouse-lineage neg , EpCAM + ) and displays the co-existence of two major sub-populations: 1) a population expressing high levels of CD44 and ALCAM (CD44 + /CD166 + ) and known to be enriched in cells with a “cancer stem cell” (CSC) phenotype (red gate); and 2) a population expressing low levels of CD44 and ALCAM (CD44 neg /CD166 neg ) and known to consist in non-tumorigenic (NT) cells (blue gate). (D) Volcano plot reporting the results of the transcription factor target gene (TFTG) analysis, in which each transcription factor (TF) is plotted based on the magnitude of its differential activation in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells following in vivo exposure to irinotecan (x-axis) and the statistical significance of such differential activation (y-axis). Dotted line: p=0.00001 (cutoff for statistical significance after Bonferroni correction). The volcano plot identifies two transcriptional repressors (E2F4, TFDP1) among the most differentially activated TFs (red dots). (E) Scatter-plots showing the fold-change in expression level following in vivo exposure to irinotecan of all measurable genes, as measured in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg cells (x-axis) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells (y-axis), and after stratification of genes in targets (red circles) and non-targets (blue triangles) of E2F4 and TFDP1. Following in vivo exposure to irinotecan, genes suppressed by E2F4 and TFDP1 display a higher induction in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg (NT) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + (CSC) cells, as revealed by their visual enrichment below the line of equivalence (x=y; dotted line). (F) Average fold-change in expression level following in vivo exposure to irinotecan, and average difference in such fold-change (Δ), for genes classified as targets and non-targets of E2F4 and TFDP1, in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg cells (NT) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells (CSC). The difference in the up-regulation of E2F4 and TFDP1 target genes is statistically significant (Welch’s t-test, 2-sided). Error bars: mean +/-95% confidence interval (CI). (G) Schematic representation of the DREAM repressor complex, listing its major structural components. The complex can include, alternatively, the RBL2 (p130) or RBL1 (p107) proteins. (H) Scatter-plot displaying the distribution of E2F4 and TFDP1 mRNA expression levels in normal colorectal tissues (n=51) and primary CRCs (n=622) included in the Colon Adenocarcinoma (COAD) and Rectal Adenocarcinoma (READ) datasets of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) repository. E2F4 and TFDP1 expression levels are positively correlated to each other (r=0.56; p <0.001). (I-J) Violin-plots comparing the distribution of E2F4 and TFDP1 expression levels between normal colorectal tissues (n=51) and primary CRCs (n=622) from TCGA’s COAD and READ datasets. Both E2F4 and TFDP1 are overexpressed in tumor as compared to normal tissues (Mann-Whitney U-test, two-sided).
    Fab6561p, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alcam+cd166+pe/pm39740663-702-176-173?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fab6561p - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems human alcam cd166 phycoerythrin pe conjugated antibody clone 105902
    (A-B) Schematic representation of the treatment regimen used to evaluate the in vivo anti-tumor activity of irinotecan (CPT-11). Irinotecan was administered to tumor-bearing mice based on a dosing schedule (50 mg/kg, once weekly x 4 weeks) designed to approximate the pharmacokinetics of the drug’s active metabolite (SN-38) in human colon cancer patients. Irinotecan’s activity was compared to that of a negative control, consisting of the drug’s vehicle alone (saline solution). Downward arrows: drug injections. Upward arrows: tumor analysis. Images created using BioRender.com. (C) Scatter-plot showing the expression profile of CD44 and ALCAM <t>(CD166)</t> in a PDX-COLON-8 tumor, as evaluated by flow cytometry. The scatter-plot is gated on live human epithelial cells (DAPI neg , Mouse-lineage neg , EpCAM + ) and displays the co-existence of two major sub-populations: 1) a population expressing high levels of CD44 and ALCAM (CD44 + /CD166 + ) and known to be enriched in cells with a “cancer stem cell” (CSC) phenotype (red gate); and 2) a population expressing low levels of CD44 and ALCAM (CD44 neg /CD166 neg ) and known to consist in non-tumorigenic (NT) cells (blue gate). (D) Volcano plot reporting the results of the transcription factor target gene (TFTG) analysis, in which each transcription factor (TF) is plotted based on the magnitude of its differential activation in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells following in vivo exposure to irinotecan (x-axis) and the statistical significance of such differential activation (y-axis). Dotted line: p=0.00001 (cutoff for statistical significance after Bonferroni correction). The volcano plot identifies two transcriptional repressors (E2F4, TFDP1) among the most differentially activated TFs (red dots). (E) Scatter-plots showing the fold-change in expression level following in vivo exposure to irinotecan of all measurable genes, as measured in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg cells (x-axis) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells (y-axis), and after stratification of genes in targets (red circles) and non-targets (blue triangles) of E2F4 and TFDP1. Following in vivo exposure to irinotecan, genes suppressed by E2F4 and TFDP1 display a higher induction in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg (NT) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + (CSC) cells, as revealed by their visual enrichment below the line of equivalence (x=y; dotted line). (F) Average fold-change in expression level following in vivo exposure to irinotecan, and average difference in such fold-change (Δ), for genes classified as targets and non-targets of E2F4 and TFDP1, in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg cells (NT) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells (CSC). The difference in the up-regulation of E2F4 and TFDP1 target genes is statistically significant (Welch’s t-test, 2-sided). Error bars: mean +/-95% confidence interval (CI). (G) Schematic representation of the DREAM repressor complex, listing its major structural components. The complex can include, alternatively, the RBL2 (p130) or RBL1 (p107) proteins. (H) Scatter-plot displaying the distribution of E2F4 and TFDP1 mRNA expression levels in normal colorectal tissues (n=51) and primary CRCs (n=622) included in the Colon Adenocarcinoma (COAD) and Rectal Adenocarcinoma (READ) datasets of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) repository. E2F4 and TFDP1 expression levels are positively correlated to each other (r=0.56; p <0.001). (I-J) Violin-plots comparing the distribution of E2F4 and TFDP1 expression levels between normal colorectal tissues (n=51) and primary CRCs (n=622) from TCGA’s COAD and READ datasets. Both E2F4 and TFDP1 are overexpressed in tumor as compared to normal tissues (Mann-Whitney U-test, two-sided).
    Human Alcam Cd166 Phycoerythrin Pe Conjugated Antibody Clone 105902, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/alcam+cd166+pe/pm39740663-830-7-14?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human alcam cd166 phycoerythrin pe conjugated antibody clone 105902 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A-B) Schematic representation of the treatment regimen used to evaluate the in vivo anti-tumor activity of irinotecan (CPT-11). Irinotecan was administered to tumor-bearing mice based on a dosing schedule (50 mg/kg, once weekly x 4 weeks) designed to approximate the pharmacokinetics of the drug’s active metabolite (SN-38) in human colon cancer patients. Irinotecan’s activity was compared to that of a negative control, consisting of the drug’s vehicle alone (saline solution). Downward arrows: drug injections. Upward arrows: tumor analysis. Images created using BioRender.com. (C) Scatter-plot showing the expression profile of CD44 and ALCAM (CD166) in a PDX-COLON-8 tumor, as evaluated by flow cytometry. The scatter-plot is gated on live human epithelial cells (DAPI neg , Mouse-lineage neg , EpCAM + ) and displays the co-existence of two major sub-populations: 1) a population expressing high levels of CD44 and ALCAM (CD44 + /CD166 + ) and known to be enriched in cells with a “cancer stem cell” (CSC) phenotype (red gate); and 2) a population expressing low levels of CD44 and ALCAM (CD44 neg /CD166 neg ) and known to consist in non-tumorigenic (NT) cells (blue gate). (D) Volcano plot reporting the results of the transcription factor target gene (TFTG) analysis, in which each transcription factor (TF) is plotted based on the magnitude of its differential activation in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells following in vivo exposure to irinotecan (x-axis) and the statistical significance of such differential activation (y-axis). Dotted line: p=0.00001 (cutoff for statistical significance after Bonferroni correction). The volcano plot identifies two transcriptional repressors (E2F4, TFDP1) among the most differentially activated TFs (red dots). (E) Scatter-plots showing the fold-change in expression level following in vivo exposure to irinotecan of all measurable genes, as measured in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg cells (x-axis) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells (y-axis), and after stratification of genes in targets (red circles) and non-targets (blue triangles) of E2F4 and TFDP1. Following in vivo exposure to irinotecan, genes suppressed by E2F4 and TFDP1 display a higher induction in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg (NT) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + (CSC) cells, as revealed by their visual enrichment below the line of equivalence (x=y; dotted line). (F) Average fold-change in expression level following in vivo exposure to irinotecan, and average difference in such fold-change (Δ), for genes classified as targets and non-targets of E2F4 and TFDP1, in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg cells (NT) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells (CSC). The difference in the up-regulation of E2F4 and TFDP1 target genes is statistically significant (Welch’s t-test, 2-sided). Error bars: mean +/-95% confidence interval (CI). (G) Schematic representation of the DREAM repressor complex, listing its major structural components. The complex can include, alternatively, the RBL2 (p130) or RBL1 (p107) proteins. (H) Scatter-plot displaying the distribution of E2F4 and TFDP1 mRNA expression levels in normal colorectal tissues (n=51) and primary CRCs (n=622) included in the Colon Adenocarcinoma (COAD) and Rectal Adenocarcinoma (READ) datasets of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) repository. E2F4 and TFDP1 expression levels are positively correlated to each other (r=0.56; p <0.001). (I-J) Violin-plots comparing the distribution of E2F4 and TFDP1 expression levels between normal colorectal tissues (n=51) and primary CRCs (n=622) from TCGA’s COAD and READ datasets. Both E2F4 and TFDP1 are overexpressed in tumor as compared to normal tissues (Mann-Whitney U-test, two-sided).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: The E2F4 transcriptional repressor is a key mechanistic regulator of colon cancer resistance to irinotecan (CPT-11)

    doi: 10.1101/2025.01.22.633435

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A-B) Schematic representation of the treatment regimen used to evaluate the in vivo anti-tumor activity of irinotecan (CPT-11). Irinotecan was administered to tumor-bearing mice based on a dosing schedule (50 mg/kg, once weekly x 4 weeks) designed to approximate the pharmacokinetics of the drug’s active metabolite (SN-38) in human colon cancer patients. Irinotecan’s activity was compared to that of a negative control, consisting of the drug’s vehicle alone (saline solution). Downward arrows: drug injections. Upward arrows: tumor analysis. Images created using BioRender.com. (C) Scatter-plot showing the expression profile of CD44 and ALCAM (CD166) in a PDX-COLON-8 tumor, as evaluated by flow cytometry. The scatter-plot is gated on live human epithelial cells (DAPI neg , Mouse-lineage neg , EpCAM + ) and displays the co-existence of two major sub-populations: 1) a population expressing high levels of CD44 and ALCAM (CD44 + /CD166 + ) and known to be enriched in cells with a “cancer stem cell” (CSC) phenotype (red gate); and 2) a population expressing low levels of CD44 and ALCAM (CD44 neg /CD166 neg ) and known to consist in non-tumorigenic (NT) cells (blue gate). (D) Volcano plot reporting the results of the transcription factor target gene (TFTG) analysis, in which each transcription factor (TF) is plotted based on the magnitude of its differential activation in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells following in vivo exposure to irinotecan (x-axis) and the statistical significance of such differential activation (y-axis). Dotted line: p=0.00001 (cutoff for statistical significance after Bonferroni correction). The volcano plot identifies two transcriptional repressors (E2F4, TFDP1) among the most differentially activated TFs (red dots). (E) Scatter-plots showing the fold-change in expression level following in vivo exposure to irinotecan of all measurable genes, as measured in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg cells (x-axis) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells (y-axis), and after stratification of genes in targets (red circles) and non-targets (blue triangles) of E2F4 and TFDP1. Following in vivo exposure to irinotecan, genes suppressed by E2F4 and TFDP1 display a higher induction in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg (NT) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + (CSC) cells, as revealed by their visual enrichment below the line of equivalence (x=y; dotted line). (F) Average fold-change in expression level following in vivo exposure to irinotecan, and average difference in such fold-change (Δ), for genes classified as targets and non-targets of E2F4 and TFDP1, in EpCAM + /CD44 neg /CD166 neg cells (NT) as compared to EpCAM + /CD44 + /CD166 + cells (CSC). The difference in the up-regulation of E2F4 and TFDP1 target genes is statistically significant (Welch’s t-test, 2-sided). Error bars: mean +/-95% confidence interval (CI). (G) Schematic representation of the DREAM repressor complex, listing its major structural components. The complex can include, alternatively, the RBL2 (p130) or RBL1 (p107) proteins. (H) Scatter-plot displaying the distribution of E2F4 and TFDP1 mRNA expression levels in normal colorectal tissues (n=51) and primary CRCs (n=622) included in the Colon Adenocarcinoma (COAD) and Rectal Adenocarcinoma (READ) datasets of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) repository. E2F4 and TFDP1 expression levels are positively correlated to each other (r=0.56; p <0.001). (I-J) Violin-plots comparing the distribution of E2F4 and TFDP1 expression levels between normal colorectal tissues (n=51) and primary CRCs (n=622) from TCGA’s COAD and READ datasets. Both E2F4 and TFDP1 are overexpressed in tumor as compared to normal tissues (Mann-Whitney U-test, two-sided).

    Article Snippet: The antibodies used to visualize cancer cells with bottom-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ) and top-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 neg , CD166 neg ) phenotypes included: anti-human-EpCAM-AlexaFluor488 (clone 9C4; BioLegend), anti-human CD44-PE-Cy7 (clone G44-26; BD Biosciences) and anti-human-CD166-PE (clone 105902; R&D Systems).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Activity Assay, Negative Control, Saline, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Activation Assay, MANN-WHITNEY

    To understand whether colon cancer cells with a cancer stem cell (CSC) phenotype displayed preferential resistance to chemotherapy, we tested whether, in immune-deficient mice engrafted with a human colon cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) line, in vivo treatment with irinotecan (CPT-11) was more capable of inducing apoptosis in cancer cells with a top-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 neg , CD166 neg ) phenotype, which are non-tumorigenic, as compared to cancer cells with a bottom-of-the-crypt phenotype (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ), which are enriched in cancer stem cells (CSCs). Adult, female, NOD/SCID/IL2Rg -/- (NSG) immune-deficient mice were engrafted sub-cutaneously (s.c.) with the PDX-COLON-8 line, which is known to contain populations with both top-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 neg , CD166 neg ) and bottom-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ) phenotypes. Tumor-bearing mice were then treated with either irinotecan (50 μg/g, once weekly x 4 weeks, i.p.) or a placebo control (1 ml of saline solution, once weekly x 4 weeks, i.p.) and sub-cutaneous tumors harvested 48 hours after the last treatment (day 24). The percentage of apoptotic cells was quantified by flow cytometry, by measuring the percentage of Annexin-V + cancer cells in each of the two phenotypic sub-populations. In vivo treatment with irinotecan (CPT-11) induced preferential apoptosis among cancer cells with a top-of-the-crypt phenotype (EpCAM + , CD44 neg , CD166 neg ) as compared to cancer cells with a bottom-of-the-crypt phenotype (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ). Differences in the percentage of Annexin-V + cancer cells between populations were tested for statistical significance using; 1) a Welch ANOVA across the full dataset (assuming unequal variance), followed by a Dunnett’s T3 test for pre-specified pairwise comparisons; and 2) a two-way ANOVA test for interaction (cell phenotype vs. chemotherapy). Increases in the percentage of Annexin-V + cancer cells caused by treatment with irinotecan were tested for statistical significance using a one-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. Error bars: mean +/-standard deviation.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: The E2F4 transcriptional repressor is a key mechanistic regulator of colon cancer resistance to irinotecan (CPT-11)

    doi: 10.1101/2025.01.22.633435

    Figure Lengend Snippet: To understand whether colon cancer cells with a cancer stem cell (CSC) phenotype displayed preferential resistance to chemotherapy, we tested whether, in immune-deficient mice engrafted with a human colon cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) line, in vivo treatment with irinotecan (CPT-11) was more capable of inducing apoptosis in cancer cells with a top-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 neg , CD166 neg ) phenotype, which are non-tumorigenic, as compared to cancer cells with a bottom-of-the-crypt phenotype (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ), which are enriched in cancer stem cells (CSCs). Adult, female, NOD/SCID/IL2Rg -/- (NSG) immune-deficient mice were engrafted sub-cutaneously (s.c.) with the PDX-COLON-8 line, which is known to contain populations with both top-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 neg , CD166 neg ) and bottom-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ) phenotypes. Tumor-bearing mice were then treated with either irinotecan (50 μg/g, once weekly x 4 weeks, i.p.) or a placebo control (1 ml of saline solution, once weekly x 4 weeks, i.p.) and sub-cutaneous tumors harvested 48 hours after the last treatment (day 24). The percentage of apoptotic cells was quantified by flow cytometry, by measuring the percentage of Annexin-V + cancer cells in each of the two phenotypic sub-populations. In vivo treatment with irinotecan (CPT-11) induced preferential apoptosis among cancer cells with a top-of-the-crypt phenotype (EpCAM + , CD44 neg , CD166 neg ) as compared to cancer cells with a bottom-of-the-crypt phenotype (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ). Differences in the percentage of Annexin-V + cancer cells between populations were tested for statistical significance using; 1) a Welch ANOVA across the full dataset (assuming unequal variance), followed by a Dunnett’s T3 test for pre-specified pairwise comparisons; and 2) a two-way ANOVA test for interaction (cell phenotype vs. chemotherapy). Increases in the percentage of Annexin-V + cancer cells caused by treatment with irinotecan were tested for statistical significance using a one-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. Error bars: mean +/-standard deviation.

    Article Snippet: The antibodies used to visualize cancer cells with bottom-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ) and top-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 neg , CD166 neg ) phenotypes included: anti-human-EpCAM-AlexaFluor488 (clone 9C4; BioLegend), anti-human CD44-PE-Cy7 (clone G44-26; BD Biosciences) and anti-human-CD166-PE (clone 105902; R&D Systems).

    Techniques: Derivative Assay, In Vivo, Control, Saline, Flow Cytometry, One-tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY, Standard Deviation

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: The E2F4 transcriptional repressor is a key mechanistic regulator of colon cancer resistance to irinotecan (CPT-11)

    doi: 10.1101/2025.01.22.633435

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: The antibodies used to visualize cancer cells with bottom-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ) and top-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 neg , CD166 neg ) phenotypes included: anti-human-EpCAM-AlexaFluor488 (clone 9C4; BioLegend), anti-human CD44-PE-Cy7 (clone G44-26; BD Biosciences) and anti-human-CD166-PE (clone 105902; R&D Systems).

    Techniques: In Vivo

    (A) Analysis by RT-qPCR of E2F4 mRNA expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells infected with lentivirus vectors encoding for shRNA constructs targeting the E2F4 mRNA. The analysis confirmed the capacity of both shRNA constructs used in this study, E2F4-shRNA[#1] and E2F4-shRNA[#2], to cause a reduction in E2F4 expression levels, as compared to what observed in parental cells infected with an empty vector (reference standard). The analysis was conducted on 6 independent models, including: a) four patient derived xenograft (PDX) lines (PDX-COLON-8, PDX-COLON-60, PDX-COLON-C441, PDX-COLON-136); and b) two conventional cell lines grown as two-dimensional (2D) monolayers (HT29, HCT116). In both cases, the analysis was conducted on purified preparations of lentivirus-infected malignant cells, isolated by FACS from primary tissues based on the expression of a green fluorescent reporter (copGFP) encoded by the lentivirus construct. Results are reported as fold-changes relative to cells infected with an empty vector, after ΔΔCt normalization to ACTB mRNA expression levels and calculation of 2 -ΔΔCt values (Livak & Schmittgen, Methods , 25:402-408, 2001). Differences in expression levels were tested for statistical significance using a two-way ANOVA test on ΔΔCt values (cell line vs. lentivirus construct) followed by Dunnett’s test on pairwise comparisons. Error bars: mean +/-standard deviation. (B) Analysis by Western blot of E2F4 protein expression in cancer cells with a bottom-of-the-crypt phenotype (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ) purified by FACS from the PDX-COLON-8 line following infection with either an empty lentivirus vector or lentivirus vectors encoding for the E2F4-shRNA [#1] or E2F4-shRNA [#2] constructs. The analysis confirmed the capacity of both shRNAs to cause a visually detectable reduction in E2F4 protein levels in the population with a bottom-of-the-crypt phenotype (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ), which is enriched in cells with cancer stem cell (CSC) properties. ACTB (β-Actin) protein levels were analyzed in parallel and used as a visual standard to normalize for the total amount of protein loaded onto the gel.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: The E2F4 transcriptional repressor is a key mechanistic regulator of colon cancer resistance to irinotecan (CPT-11)

    doi: 10.1101/2025.01.22.633435

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Analysis by RT-qPCR of E2F4 mRNA expression in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells infected with lentivirus vectors encoding for shRNA constructs targeting the E2F4 mRNA. The analysis confirmed the capacity of both shRNA constructs used in this study, E2F4-shRNA[#1] and E2F4-shRNA[#2], to cause a reduction in E2F4 expression levels, as compared to what observed in parental cells infected with an empty vector (reference standard). The analysis was conducted on 6 independent models, including: a) four patient derived xenograft (PDX) lines (PDX-COLON-8, PDX-COLON-60, PDX-COLON-C441, PDX-COLON-136); and b) two conventional cell lines grown as two-dimensional (2D) monolayers (HT29, HCT116). In both cases, the analysis was conducted on purified preparations of lentivirus-infected malignant cells, isolated by FACS from primary tissues based on the expression of a green fluorescent reporter (copGFP) encoded by the lentivirus construct. Results are reported as fold-changes relative to cells infected with an empty vector, after ΔΔCt normalization to ACTB mRNA expression levels and calculation of 2 -ΔΔCt values (Livak & Schmittgen, Methods , 25:402-408, 2001). Differences in expression levels were tested for statistical significance using a two-way ANOVA test on ΔΔCt values (cell line vs. lentivirus construct) followed by Dunnett’s test on pairwise comparisons. Error bars: mean +/-standard deviation. (B) Analysis by Western blot of E2F4 protein expression in cancer cells with a bottom-of-the-crypt phenotype (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ) purified by FACS from the PDX-COLON-8 line following infection with either an empty lentivirus vector or lentivirus vectors encoding for the E2F4-shRNA [#1] or E2F4-shRNA [#2] constructs. The analysis confirmed the capacity of both shRNAs to cause a visually detectable reduction in E2F4 protein levels in the population with a bottom-of-the-crypt phenotype (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ), which is enriched in cells with cancer stem cell (CSC) properties. ACTB (β-Actin) protein levels were analyzed in parallel and used as a visual standard to normalize for the total amount of protein loaded onto the gel.

    Article Snippet: The antibodies used to visualize cancer cells with bottom-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 + , CD166 + ) and top-of-the-crypt (EpCAM + , CD44 neg , CD166 neg ) phenotypes included: anti-human-EpCAM-AlexaFluor488 (clone 9C4; BioLegend), anti-human CD44-PE-Cy7 (clone G44-26; BD Biosciences) and anti-human-CD166-PE (clone 105902; R&D Systems).

    Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Infection, shRNA, Construct, Plasmid Preparation, Derivative Assay, Purification, Isolation, Standard Deviation, Western Blot